顯示： 7 - 12 (最新發表)
優點:
蔡司鏡
缺點:
今年已經壞第五次
評價:
有冇師兄試過成日壞sony alpha 鏡？我支sony 超聲波鏡只是用來影吓生活照,今年已經壞第五次,每次整完唔夠兩個月又壞。成萬蚊支行貨Sony Alpha鏡入廠多過影相,真係行衰運!早知買Nikon機應該可靠D。如各位大大有類似情況請分享及指教。
優點:
令人嘆為觀止既sharpness：淨係f2.8就已經係定焦級數
有SSM加持：對焦好靜
色彩滿意：雖然冇乜“菜味”，但飽和度也見十足
外觀高貴：金屬鏡身，蔡司logo
有SSM加持：對焦好靜
色彩滿意：雖然冇乜“菜味”，但飽和度也見十足
外觀高貴：金屬鏡身，蔡司logo
缺點:
只得一個重字
評價:
呢支實屬“鏡皇”，全開f2.8已經好sharp，收到f5.6更有輕微提升。sharp過曬所有變焦都不在話下,配合a850既24MP，成像細膩得無話可說
優點:
Awesome image quality, as a zoom lens, sharpness comparable to a fixed focal length lens.
Aperture 2.8 usable.
Creamy bokeh exclusive to Carl Zeiss
High resiliency against color fringe.
Good range to use on fullframe.
Fast auto focus.
come with pouch and metal hood.
Aperture 2.8 usable.
Creamy bokeh exclusive to Carl Zeiss
High resiliency against color fringe.
Good range to use on fullframe.
Fast auto focus.
come with pouch and metal hood.
缺點:
Expensive $10700 @ BroadXXX (12months instalment)
Heavy. Even 200g heavier than Sigma HSM. You need a batterygrip for better balance even on A850/A900
Quite bulky in size, I dread using Quick Strap with this lens.
Image quality dwindles at the tele end. Not IF. At 70mm the extension tube protrudes, affecting its aesthetic. (Easyto trap dust within the lens too. I checked three lens before I found one free of dust)
Heavy. Even 200g heavier than Sigma HSM. You need a batterygrip for better balance even on A850/A900
Quite bulky in size, I dread using Quick Strap with this lens.
Image quality dwindles at the tele end. Not IF. At 70mm the extension tube protrudes, affecting its aesthetic. (Easyto trap dust within the lens too. I checked three lens before I found one free of dust)
評價:
I owned a sigma 2470DG EX HSM before. I could not agree more that it was superbly built and a value for money. Yet Carl Zeiss goes more than a bargain. It is one of a kind considering its incomparable sharpness, saturation bokeh and contrast to any of its optic counterparts. I was born at the mid 80s. The film camera era ended a tad earlier than the time I could afford a camera. Thus, the reminiscence of Contax and Leica was Greek to me and I hardly understand the obstinacy of many Chings on Carl Zeiss. ‘Seeing is believing’. I am proud to tell that I own one. Carl Zeiss demonstrates how a picture paints a thousand words and sometimes, beyond words.
優點:
焦距好，室內、室外、花、景、人殺曬
成像唔多講！
拿出街都幾型，口徑大、有手感
成像唔多講！
拿出街都幾型，口徑大、有手感
缺點:
重-我like
貴$10500-不過用用下你會覺得 值!
Sony出買部950就完美了
貴$10500-不過用用下你會覺得 值!
Sony出買部950就完美了
評價:
我用緊550，快門差不多10000了，
機本上80%以上的相都係24-70ZA。
不管APS定係FF焦距好好用；
係我鏡頭蓋。
機本上80%以上的相都係24-70ZA。
不管APS定係FF焦距好好用；
係我鏡頭蓋。
優點:
令人嘆為觀止既sharpness：淨係f2.8就已經係定焦級數
有SSM加持：對焦好靜
色彩滿意：雖然冇乜“菜味”，但飽和度也見十足
外觀高貴：金屬鏡身，蔡司logo
變形控制OK：以變焦黎講算輕微
有SSM加持：對焦好靜
色彩滿意：雖然冇乜“菜味”，但飽和度也見十足
外觀高貴：金屬鏡身，蔡司logo
變形控制OK：以變焦黎講算輕微
缺點:
冇防塵滴：未能同防水既a850出生入死
個hood好怪：抗耀光又冇用，個樣又唔得，唔係裝係鏡筒度扮唔到“內變焦”。一句講曬，冇黎霸氣
個hood好怪：抗耀光又冇用，個樣又唔得，唔係裝係鏡筒度扮唔到“內變焦”。一句講曬，冇黎霸氣
評價:
呢支實屬“鏡皇”，全開f2.8已經好sharp，收到f5.6更有輕微提升。sharp過曬所有變焦都不在話下（包括其他廠既2470鏡皇），連屋企唔少minolta定焦都唔係佢對手。配合a850既24MP，成像細膩得無話可說。
果然是貴族CZ既出品，只可以話佢係一支“身嬌肉貴”既鏡，配上sony FF機身，唔淋得雨，唔太適合影運動（追焦，連拍麻麻），所以唔o岩職業（尤指記者）用。不過，呢支鏡又偏偏擁有最高既optical quality，正正吸引到我呢D業餘用家。
另外，關於“菜味”，個人覺得黎到數碼時代，要尋回所謂“菜味”已經冇乜可能。我亦都未能係呢支鏡上面搵返以前既蔡司色彩。但係，我可以講，唔係冇“菜味”就代表唔掂，蔡司既ZA鏡有既係新一代“鏡皇”既標準，有自己獨特既定位，發色，散景。要追求味道既可以玩返contax；而要追求AF既便利，高解像力既震撼，就只有今時今日既sony既“自動蔡”。
果然是貴族CZ既出品，只可以話佢係一支“身嬌肉貴”既鏡，配上sony FF機身，唔淋得雨，唔太適合影運動（追焦，連拍麻麻），所以唔o岩職業（尤指記者）用。不過，呢支鏡又偏偏擁有最高既optical quality，正正吸引到我呢D業餘用家。
另外，關於“菜味”，個人覺得黎到數碼時代，要尋回所謂“菜味”已經冇乜可能。我亦都未能係呢支鏡上面搵返以前既蔡司色彩。但係，我可以講，唔係冇“菜味”就代表唔掂，蔡司既ZA鏡有既係新一代“鏡皇”既標準，有自己獨特既定位，發色，散景。要追求味道既可以玩返contax；而要追求AF既便利，高解像力既震撼，就只有今時今日既sony既“自動蔡”。
優點:
24-70 2.8 Zeiss, 一萬頭簡直大平賣！
缺點:
重！重過我部A350好多，所以一定要用直倒。
鏡身係膠做。相對Planar 85 1.4, 質感差好遠，且沒有防水滴設計。
鏡身係膠做。相對Planar 85 1.4, 質感差好遠，且沒有防水滴設計。
評價:
第一次用Zeiss zoom lens，感覺比想象中好。相對定焦鏡，不是差很遠。
