[WayneTong]

1) Tokina 16-28 F2.8
2) Sigma 12-24 F4.5-5.6
3) C 鏡

大家會點選擇呢？？本人想用黎影風景及人象各半。

[hotfire009]

T&S都係突出鏡頭，用落好唔方便

[dcfandy]

1) Tokina 16-28 F2.8 未用過，FF唔撰佢。
2) Sigma 12-24 F4.5-5.6 是一支好Wide的風景鏡非常震撼，影人像一般。
3) 想用黎影風景及人象，見意買回canon 16-35，17-40呢的原廠鏡。

[叮噹仔]

1) Tokina 16-28 F2.8 未用過，FF唔撰佢
呢支係for FF 用既wide鏡.......

[dcfandy]

師兄Tokina 16-28 F2.8 我未用過，FF要wide撰Sigma 12-24,OR買回原廠
canon 16-35影風景及人象咁意見,THX

[nobody123]

四支用過，只贊成入原廠兩支

[h0001244]

want to hear nobody ching opinion on the four lenses

[siusiusiusun]

除左色馬果支外, 其餘全部用過.
我意見係反而唔推介兩支原廠, 除非你用黎開工做JOB 用, 因為呢2支對焦最快同理輕.

但CANON 兩支超廣變焦係出名一個字: 雞
點縮光圈 四角畫質都係散的.

唔同長鏡及定焦, CANON 廣角鏡係不及NIKON, 甚至TOKINA都好過佢.

[h0001244]

I heard my brother in law said he satisfy with T16-28, he said even better than 16-35L.
I just remember that rumor said Tokina was formed by ex-Nikon employers, therefore their lens design is quite similar to Nikon ten years ago. And that said, Tokina can good wide lens like nikon

[shman]

C lens

[BITTE]

CANON 16-35II

[sl132]

正如 nobody123 ching 在另一post 所言, T16-28 在順光時表現可以,但逆光則時常出現鬼影!

[MCCU]

Tokina 16-28 F2.8
Sigma 12-24 F4.5-5.6
以上二支 可以SURE 解折度比唔上Canon 16-35L 同17-40L
L色當然只有CANON 有

sigma 12-24 FF 係wide 好多

[siusiusiusun]

開玩笑

[mluk06]

Tokina 支17-35 ,f/4 可靠嗎 ? 現價$4590 買得過嗎? 比17-40 如何, 多謝指教 !